Firearms General (235)
It's from here: LINK
S&W (a registered trademark - I am not affiliated with) model 37 promo poster
Written by reg mathuszThis is a great revolver, I got one a few years back when RSR had exclusive distribution of them. Supposedly, they were (1) made from spare parts that S&W (a registered trademark that I am not affiliated with) had found stockpiled, (2) left over from a police dept. overrun. Who knows? But they were one of the first J-frame Airweights (not J-magnum frame) to be released (relreleased) without the SafTHammer lock. Mine is factory DAO with a bobbed hammer. It is stamped 37-2. Some were stamped "+P" while some were not.
[Removed]
Answer: When did Springfield Armory start using XD Melonite treated slides
Written by reg mathuszEarly XD's had a reputed problem of rusting too easily. I asked them when they started their Melonite metal treatment (it hardens the steel). Here is the reply (full name, email and phone removed):
"If the model was produced after Feb 1st 2006, it will have a melonite finish on it.
Thanks, Tom "
S&W M&P striker 6 month update -- works great!
Written by reg mathuszSo, back in July of last year my M&P 9mm old-style (black) striker broke. S&W sent me a new style (silver) replacement that I dropped in. See: link .
I am pleased to say that after 6 months the replacement functions perfectly and the trigger is much improved like the newest versions that you buy off the shelf today.
Woohoo! Kudus to S&W for taking care of this and continuously improving their products! I also own a 9c and will be adding a 40S&W model shortly.
S&W 645 hammer in S&W 1066 to gain half-cock, and S&W sears
Written by reg mathuszWell, in rebuilding my second 1006 into a 1066 I wanted to put in a 645 hammer because it has a half-cock notch. Why? Because it makes the double-action stroke shorter and reminds me of my Sig P-220.
I was warned that the roll over of the 2nd Gen S&W's was not as good as the 3rd gens (which the 1006 and 1066 are). I was given three sears to attempt to compensate for it: #2, #4, and #6.
The #4 is what the pistol had in it and the DA with the new hammer was HEAVY.
The #6 actually had the best DA and SA pulls BUT the break was HARD.
The #2 was the best compromise but the rollover was still noticeable.
I pulled it out and went back to the original hammer. Interestingly, I also tried my four different sears. The best and worst overall triggers went to the #4's (one was really nice and the other terrible catch on break).
Weird huh?
What happened to Sig's QC and customer service?
Written by reg mathuszSig P-series used to be world renown for quality, function/reliability, fit and finish. They are also far from cheap often called the Cadillac or BMW (use whatever car analogy you like) of firearms. How would you like it if your brand new P-series looked like the pics in this thread?
LINK: SigForum thread with pics - Should my Sig look like this after 400 rds?
Yes, it is cosmetic and the pistol functional, but so what? You pay a premium for a Sig. Sig saw pictures and called this "normal" wear. When asked why previous generations don't "break in" like they responded that they couldn't comment.
I own several Sigs, and many pistols tighter than a Sig without looking like that. "Normal"? If that it is "normal" it will not be normal for me to plunk down my $ on one. Too bad, because a P229 was on the short list.
ETA:
Here are some shots from a brand new P220 SS ELITE (i.e. NOT cheap):
LINK - SigForum Thread
No more Browning HiPower in 40S&W -- all steel 40's scarce
Written by reg mathuszWell,
Did anybody notice that the HiPower chambered for 40S&W is no longer on the Browning.com website?
I was looking at current production ALL STEEL 40S&W's and was disappointed to see that it is gone.
So, what does that leave?
1. CZ75 based pistols (compact discontinued although RAMI still made)
2. Tanfoglio EAA Witness (CZ copies)
3. Surely, somebody makes a 1911 chambered in 40. Perhaps STI
4. Springfield EMP (shrunken 1911)
5. Sig P229 Elite (I think this is still in production)
Used market!
1. S&W 4006 2. Colt Defender
3. Browning/FN HiPower
4. Sig P229 stainless
5. HK P7M10
6. CZ75 Compact
I am sure there are more, but those are the ones that immediately come to mind...
FNS - New FN pistol based on FNx but striker based
Written by reg mathuszIn case you haven't seen it yet:
http://www.federalpremium.com/pdf/45_Auto_warning.pdf
Details are in the link above, but in a nutshell AE, Champion, HiShok, and HydraShok that fall under these lot #'s:
38X628 to 38X765
38T401 to 38T414
Ok, here is some info mainly for me but may be of interest to S&W 10xx fans. I wanted to put a lot of the 10xx info together in one place. These have been compiled from various sources available on the internet.
parts diagram (holy cow -- there were only ~5000 1066's!):
FBI training diagram on lubricating their 1076:
FBI 1076 Training Manual (pdf):
fbi_m1076_instruction_guide
Detail stripping the frame is pretty easy, if you know how to put the sear in:
FBI Adoption Report:
fbi_10mm_notes
More...
So, the 1006 is a little long so I thought I would make it a 1066. :)
The 1006 has a 5" barrel while the 1066 is 4.25". Other than that the pistols are identical, but it changes the balance quite a bit and is obviously more carryable.
Notice the shorter slide length in front of the dust cover.
1006 with 1066 slide assembly:
UPDATE: 10/08/2011 more pics moved from Flickr and are available in this post:
My new (to me) 1006
Well, it is from a 1006 (but not the mint one I just got). More on this one to come but here is a pic of the bubbled part which (I think) is causing the trigger to slightly catch in SA mode. Luckily, the reset is super short so one would never notice it during normal firing. However, since I have a mint 1006 next to this one to compare it was noticeable. Playing with the trigger play spring is how I noticed...So, what is this part and since it is catching on the frame, could it cause the famous 3rd gen SA trigger click? I think maybe..
What is interesting is that this 1006 is a former PD pistol and I suspect it has clicked/stuck from day 1!
UPDATE:
02/20/2011 - This part was replaced and appears that although it caught slightly it was not the cause of the clicking. I will do a complete write up on putting back together 1006 #2 shortly.
My new (to me) 1006 - a 10mm tank - and story
Written by reg mathuszSo, my first experience with the 1006 was in 1990 on a rental range. My girlfriend at the time absolutely loved it. I fell in love with the round but not the pistol -- it was big, bulky, and heavy. It was a double-action/heavy first shot with a single action in which the trigger moved dramatically towards the frame. The safety was on the slide and worked the opposite of what I thought it should. It had plastic grips and a magazine disconnect. It was also very expensive. You see, I had just recently bought my first handgun (and one that I would carry for years to come) a Springfield 1911. I still have it and pics are on this site. It was chambered in 45ACP because it was $100 more for the 10mm version and the ammo was harder to come by and more expensive. I always thought I could get the 10mm linkless version later. Little did I know.
Enter 20 or so years later. I have come to appreciate some of those "negatives" I used to disdain. I have been looking for a 1006 locally for some time. I had seen a total of two. The first one I lost because I waited for the next day to buy it. The next one the buyer decided not to sell. However, I got a phone call from my local shop asking if I still was looking for one and they had got a LNIB in trade. They put it aside for me and I got it.
I couldn't be more pleased. I still love 1911's but what the heck was I thinking back then? This pistol was far ahead of its time. And it is a tank -- by far the heaviest duty 10mm that I own (ok, my other two are 1911's).
Let's start with some pics...You can click on each one for the full view. From top to bottom left to right.
1. 1006 barrel close up - maybe the former owner shot a box or two through it.
2. Box - inside was the manual, sight adjustment tool, cleaning rod and brushes.
Product code puts it at a 1990-1 manufacture.
3. Closeup - Pics don't do it justice. My wife was surprised at how big the pistol is.
4. Feed ramp close up - remember these came out in 1990!
5. Strangely, I got one yellow follower mag (probably original) and one of the newer white follower mags with the "improved" accuguide improvement to hold the rounds from moving forward from recoil.
6. Slide to frame fit - remember this is production pistol from 1990!
7. Left side
8. 9 shot mags stood up
9. Some features ahead of their time in a production pistol. From left to right: front strap serrations (still a mainstay on S&W 1911's), undercut trigger guard (something pistols even today could learn from), checkered trigger guard
10. Side shot with slide locked open
11. Guide rod tube - this is included because a lot of Colt fans seem to think/complain if the wall thickness is not completely symmetrical. If you look REALLY close it is a little off. LOL
12. Rear sight closeup - fully adjustable with huge side shields. I like them and the way they look.
13. Reassembly wackiness - So, here is one thing that seems wacky: The hammer is cocked during disassembly (because the slide is pulled back). But, to put it back together you have to press down on three levers (I attempted to take a fuzzy picture to show, but neglected to focus). Anyway, one of those levers decocks the hammer. You then have to hold the three levers down to pull the slide onto the frame. Seems odd.
14. Guide rod and recoil spring assembly - the end is actually a spring loaded buffer. Neat.
15. Right side
16. Recoil rod fits into that notch. Does it look a little small and that you should be careful and hold onto the rod/spring while dis/assembly? It is.
All in all a beautiful pistol and probably the toughest (former) full production 10mm from a major manufacturer and I am glad to have one, but sad that it took me so long to appreciate it.
[gallery link="file" orderby="title"]
08/10/11: Pics moved off of Flikr.
Well, just brought home a LNIB S&W 1006 (I will save that for another post shortly as soon as I get some pics) and found that my main safe is out of room for pistols. Or rather, needs to be rearranged, or I need to make another pistol rack.
It was easier to rearrange. So, some items are more used than others and I thought I might as well box them and save space (yeah, it really depends on the item's box doesn't it?) and stack the boxes at a large unused space in one of the bottom corners of the safe. Yes, I know it isn't the best way to store firearms to keep them pristine but it will work until I make a new rack.
So, a couple of the items going into their boxes:
- Colt Mustang Plus II (wife's) - replaced by S&W Walther PPK
- S&W 1006 - ironic since this why I made room, but the thing is brand new
- Ruger Redhawk Hunter 7.5" - did you know they don't make these in blue any more? (and you probably thought I only had S&W's)
- FN HiPower 40 - NIB (I have two)