Holsters (8)
Review of the Craft Holster CH-100 OWB (for Sig P220)
Written by reg mathuszWhen Craft Holsters offered to send an OWB holster to do a review I jumped. As readers may know, I am a big fan of a good leather holster.
One of my favorite holsters (and first good holster) was a Galco Combat Master (also my first pistol). I still own both. I'd have to check my receipts but that was 30 years ago. I remember because, for me, it was a big jump $-wise to go from an Uncle Mikes holster to the Galco.
What I am saying is that a good leather holster is an investment and will serve you for many years to come. They are definitely worth the money.
I carried that combination for many years, but at some point I switched to a Sig P220 for its light-weight and out-of-box accuracy (even in my hands). At the time, I tried to go the route of an IWB like a Kramer but it is just not a very concealable pistol. As I got older it became impractical to me to to carry a such a large pistol and like others, I moved onto smaller more concealable pistols for CCW.
Although no longer my CCW pistol I still have a soft spot for my P220. In fact, taking it to the range reminded just how well it still shoots. Going through my box of holsters, I realized that I never did end up with a holster for it - I had traded/sold them!
That brings me back to Craft Holster's offer.
After taking a look at their website: http://www.craftholsters.com I was happy to find that P220. In fact, there is a good variety of other models that can sometimes harder to find. In my recent search (and on their site): CZ 75 Compact, HK VP9sk, Beretta 92 Compact (with or without rail). Additionally, newer pistols models are available like the new Glock 43x and 48. For newer Sig fans the P320s, P365 and 938 are also represented.
The "holster finder" allows you to find all their holsters that fit your model. It also gives you an in-stock status and estimated ship time.
So, with fall weather here (full size pistol time) and feeling a bit of old-school Sig nostalgia I requested a holster for my P220.
In just a few days a box arrived with the holster. The packaging is the ship box. I am all for minimal packaging, especially if it helps keeps the cost lower. For me, most of that stuff gets thrown away or lost anyway. The inside of the box has some information on their holster email club (10% off your second holster and email offers) along with support info:
The holster has a nice tan outer finish – mahogany. The boning is more detailed than the average holster, with a typical depth. I was pleased that there was no out-of-the box stain smell:
The first thing that I noticed is how thin the holster is. Leather work has come a long way! The issue with my old IWB attempts with the Kramer and now defunct C5 Custom Leather was how thick they were.
This is very thin:
Noteworthy is that the inside of the holster is unfinished and unlined. Lining adds additional cost and supposedly saves wear on your pistol, but I haven't noticed a difference.
An inside finish looks nice at first but it always wear off with usage and ends up looking the same.I have plenty of black leather holsters where the inside is tan now.
I am not personally concerned with holster wear on pistol. If it's a safe queen it should probably be in the safe and not a holster ;)
Inside, different angle:
The company logo and name are prominently stamped on the back-side. It is very clean, minimal, and looks very nice:
One thing that would be a nice addition to the holster would be what model it fits stamped into the holster - We all have A box of holsters that we are not quite sure of what they fit. For fun, I did a quick check of a few of my holsters and found that some companies, some do not, and a few vendors simply wrote the model in Sharpie on the inside of the holster. It works!
Continuing on...Double-stitching on the interior and single-stitching on the outside looks great!
Oops, is that a missing stitch at the bottom left? I am not sure if that is intentional, but there is no loose thread. Regardless, it is certainly no practical issue.
Another shot of the stitching and it also shows that muzzle is completely protected. This saves your jeans:
The sweat shield may look small but it works perfectly without requiring a huge shield. Craft calls it a partial shield and, if not convinced, does also offer a holster with a full shield.
The partial shield is a huge advantage over holsters without one (like the Galco Combat Master). Some of my other holsters do have a full guard, Sometimes they are even reinforced - and they are always huge - now I wonder why? Craft proves that all that extra material and thickness simply isn’t needed.
Notice how the "partial shield" does not dramatically over-arch the holster body?
It may not look like it covers the whole pistol completely, but I didn't feel the pistol against me. No cold steel sensation -- even with an un-tucked t-shirt.
I think that this is my favorite feature of the holster!
View from the other side:
You may have noticed that the holster does not have a reinforced mouth. Many feel that this is a requirement for rapid re-holstering. I have both and to be honest, I have never had an urgent need to re-holster. Still, it is nice not to have to use an additional hand as some holsters seem to collapse without the pistol. The Craft is actually not bad reholstering. I can press the P220 into the holster and re-holster with minimal effort and with one-hand - this is not something that I can do with all my OWB holsters.
NOTE: You do need to always glance down prior to holstering to ensure that there is no obstruction or anything that may catch the trigger. This is true of all holsters.
On the other hand (and more important to me) is that the pistol draws clean without any drag. There is no retention, but I did flip it upside down and it did not fall out with a light shake (sorry, no pic of that lol).
The belt slots are a standard 1.5”.
It fits my Wildnerness 5-Stitch perfectly:
It also fits the Wilderness CSM (polymer insert model):
One belt that a lot of holsters (especially Kydex) have issues with is the Galco SB2. It is simply ridiculously thick. Mine is at least 30 years old! (remember the quality leather statement)
The belt is a little snug going through the loops, but the Craft passes that thick belt test!
Wow, itwas a snug fit! But to be fair it is thicker than any of my other belts:
The loops passed through my Relentless Tactical "Steel Core" Ultimate Belt without any problems:
After wearing the holster for several weeks, the only noticeable wear was from squeezing the Galco Belt through! Nice quality leather and good finish.
Speaking of wearing the holster, I found it to be very comfortable. What was surprising is that the Craft's loops loops actually bend inward towards your body. With other holsters, like the Galco Combat Master, you can distinctly feel the edge of the pistol at the main holster body. I could not with the Craft. The only reason that I could think of was because of the loops. I was able to wear the holster, even seated all-day without any problem. Also, thinking that the lops bending makes the holster body a little more rigid making it easy to holster/reholster than others.
I struggled to come up with a pic that illustrates this, but this was all I could come up with. NOTE: I am actually wearing it in the pic - I tried a darker shirt but you couldn't see anything then):
In some of the photos above you can also see how the loops have become bent in from wearing it.
To conclude, the Craft Holster is very will made. It is basic (no lining, mouth reinforcement, etc) leather holster that is practical and comfortable. Their standard partial sweat guard works amazingly well and IMO should be on every holster!
Incidentally, their holsters are covered by a 5yr warranty but I suspect it will last MANY years to come.
This will not be my last from them:
Craft Holsters P220 holster selection:
https://www.craftholsters.com/sig-sauer-p220-holsters
There is a newer slimmer holster that is slimmer with better reholster capability:
https://www.craftholsters.com/open-top-leather-pancake-holster-panther
Holsters are a critical piece of equipment often taken for granted. The difference between a good holster is carrying your firearm or not. The first rule of a gun fight is to have a gun. For most of us, that means having a good holster (and belt, but that is a different story).
I started off my CCW-years using leather only. Leather is amazingly comfortable. But, in recent years, like a lot of people I moved away from leather for Kydex holsters. Kydex simply became more cost effective, thinner, lighter and for some reason the Kydex companies seemed able to add new models quicker. Over the years custom leather holster prices soared and seemed expensive. Kydex filled a category in between leather and inexpensive nylon. I even tried several less expensive custom leather companies, with mixed results. It was hit and miss.
Fast forward. I received an offer from Falco Holsters to try out one of their leather holsters. I had seen their holsters offered before on vendor sites and was curious. But, to be honest, I had never tried one before because I thought that their name was a play off of Galco Leather. It was time to give leather another try.
I was allowed to pick (from a list) of what I wanted and scrolled through the list of supported firearms (https://www.falcoholsters.com/list-of-available-guns). In particular, I was impressed by their CZ support. I have a CZ 75 Compact that is a tack driver. However, finding a good holster for it has been difficult. I have a few and none of them are satisfactory. The pistol's shape/weight is just hard for me to carry/conceal comfortably. I was pleased that Falco has a mold. Additionally, Falco has holsters for the traditional CZ75, the P01, the P07, and even the striker P10c. Impressive! CZ sells everything that they import, often with waiting lists, so I knew that CZ fans would be interested too.
Depending on what you are looking for you will like/dislike any holster maker. For newer firearms, I saw that Falco has a mold for the HK VP9 but not the VP9sk. Additionally, they have a mold for things like the Walther P99, the PPQ and even the PPX but not the PPQsc. Demand always dictates. There was nothing for the Ruger American Series while, not surprisingly, there are a number of options for the Sig P320.
Incidentally, a lot of revolvers are represented - but you may have to do your homework. For example, the only S&W 19 model they list is the 4", however, a lot of other K-frame lengths are available, but expressed in alternate model #'s (65/66, etc). I was pleased that 3"-ers are fairly well represented. I have an affinity for 3” revolvers and a quick view shows that Falco has holsters for the 3” SP101, K and L Frames. Nice!
I chose an IWB leather holster for my CZ75 Compact. I chose a model with snaps separate from the main body of the holster. In fact, the holster's configuration is due to the plethora of options available that I chose (sweat shield, cant, no retention screw, color, stitching, etc.)
The pistol itself (for those unfamiliar) is an all steel mid-size double-stack 9mm - fairly thick and heavy. It is a double-action with a hammer, kind of old school now:
Yes, it's empty:
I received the holster from Falco. Their website allows you to pick and choose the options you want, and there are a lot! It came from Slovakia and was professionally packaged:
The back, with some basic instructions on break in, usage and care:
The holster itself:
The Falco logo distinctly marks it. Everything about the holster is professionally done. No short-cuts here.
I instantly took it out and ended up wearing it for several days.
Actually, the fact that I was able to wear it that long speaks volumes. My last holster (Kydex) I gave up on after a few hours. It was not comfortable and printed – strangely the front top of slide.
I did NOT have any of these problems with the Falco. It concealed easily in just a t-shirt (that's good for a not super thin guy like me).
There was no break-in period as the instructions implied and is often expected from a leather holster. Perhaps it is from the boning being not being super deeply embossed, but it definitely enough to ensure good fit:
My CZ75 Compact fits in it perfectly. But, if you are looking for a holster where the pistol “snaps” into it with a positive retention – more than just by gravity you will want to order an holster with the retention screw option. Since I am not anticipating being upside down I did not order it with one (that's a joke). It's just what I prefer.
This falls somewhere in the middle (not loose or tight) which is a good thing IMO.
So for actual usage...
One thing that I have to do (and dislike) is frequently disarm when going to certain places. But, I often leave my holster on so that I can re-holster when possible.
I was pleasantly surprised at how well this worked with the Falco - the holster compacts ridiculously comfortably when the pistol is not it. It does not feel bulky like a Kydex holster which retains it shape. Putting the pistol back in it is no problem with the Falco’s reinforced mouth as shown in the pic above and below:
The construction of the holster is very well done. There is double-stitching for the main body:
Threads are very thick. You have the option of picking an alternate color.
I was a little bit disappointed that the snaps are not one-way - but they are very positive in snapping open/close and require quite a bit of force to undo. In fact, for the pics it took a bit of effort to snap/unsnap them without the pistol. These are not cheap snaps.
The Falco logo on them is a nice touch:
The sweat shield, even though from the pics looks a bit short, especially if you carry the pistol half-cock (which I do) or cocked and locked but I did not encounter any discomfort.
Hammer is actually fully covered:
I do not feel the hammer even in condition 1.
Sweat guard is rugged and is not flimsy:
Reinforced sweat guard from the back:
The muzzle is completely covered"
In short, this is a holster that has turned my CZ75 Compact into something that I would carry as an everyday CCW piece. A pretty good feat considering its almost 33oz weight.
Folks always ask for some shots of inside the holster, about the thickness, wear, etc. Here are a few:
Thickness/stiffness incidentally is nice. It is not a hard stiff like the new Galco holsters like the Concealable but not soft like the Don Hume.
Somewhere in between - I am not sure that helps.
From a slightly different angle, shows a little bit of rub marks (I am actually using it lol):
Slide top clears with no rubbing:
I have only been wearing it for 3 days now so the physical wear is minimal. No issue wearing it all day sitting with no pistol.
What is amazing is that I don't mind wearing this heavy pistol. This includes walking around or just hanging out at the house watching (and losing at fantasy) football.
I also have to mention that the finish is professionally done -- I have had a number of holster makers dye come off after a very short period of time which has always distinguished them from big brands like Galco.
This is not the case here, this holster has no signs of any of the finish/dye coming off. Oh, there is NO dye smell from the holster at all.
Incidentally, Falco Holsters also have a 5 year warranty.
If you are looking for a holster I highly recommend that you give Falco a try: https://falcoholsters.com - They are the real deal! I see some 3" revolver holsters in my future.
I do hope that they add some of the new striker compacts like the HK VP9sk and Walther PPQsc to their line in the future though.
I have been getting some inquiries if I am still alive.
I am!!
I have some new things coming up shortly. I am ordering the last few parts to complete my BCM build this week, and have a couple new holsters to review:
BladeTech Eclipse for a S&W 1066 and Scorpius Tactical Defender for a Browning HiPower (I know - some different choices). The Ozarks IWB holster (Glock). I have to order it still, but also the internet famous Raven Concealment Systems (RCS) for a more common Glock.
Also, making plans for upcoming ShowSHOW 2015! It just takes $ :)
May Mark Craighead rest in peace. He was a pioneer in holster making (look how many copies there are now) and a gentleman to work with. http://www.momwithagun.com/2012/08/r-i-p-mark-craighead/
About a week ago I dropped by Blade-Tech to pick up holster. Their customer service is stellar and they had the holster done (at no charge) in a day, even cutting it to custom length for me. Anyway, you can read the details here: http://fortreg.com/firearms/?p=2149. But, this is about the tour...
Blade-Tech kindly offered to give me a factory tour which I gladly took them up on. For those that don't know Blade-Tech is located in Puyallup, WA (kind of between Seattle and Tacoma).
I was first struck by the size of the facility. I parked and walked up to a building marked BladeTech. That was the first suite which was not retail accessible. I kept walking...and walking...about four suite lengths. That's when it dawned on me--The whole strip was Blade-Tech! They have grown quite a bit since they first opened up Lakewood, WA!
They currently occupy approximately 30K square feet. They were literally expanding (knocking out walls, etc) into 45K as I took the tour with eyes on expanding even more. If you were thinking that they are a small shop, you would be wrong!
I didn't realize it, but they have two knife divisions and a fire safety equipment division. They build soft goods, for example fire extinguisher carriers.
Speaking of soft goods, they are expand that line into the vest/armor carrier market! Think Tactical Tailor type gear.
Back to the tour...
I saw an injection mold machine used for their Revolution line of holsters. It uses little plastic pellets that are shaped/sized like wood stove pellets. I think they said there are two.
I was lucky enough to be there while the Kydex mold machine (sorry, not sure what it is actually called) was running. I will try and explain it as best I remember. It runs two molds at once.
Basically there are Kydex sheets of different thickness depending on what they are making. Interesting, because I have noticed that some of their competitors only use one thickness. Logically, Blade-Tech's IWB holsters are thinner than a level III duty holster. I didn't count, but there were at least three different sizes.
So, these sheets are placed into ovens and heated up. The pistol molds are placed on top of two separate vacuums. These molds have tiny holes in them. The heated sheets are placed on top of the mold and the vacuum basically sucks them onto the shape of the molds!
Several large blowers then cool the roughly formed holsters. If you pictured someone with a hair dryer to heat the Kydex to mold it and then a fan to cool it off, you have the right concept, just not nearly on the same scale or technology.
From the holsters are checked by hand. Actually, let me just mention that I was genuinely surprised at how much a Blade-Tech holster is made by hand. It then goes to a person that actually puts a mold of the firearm to finish fitting. After that it goes to a person that puts the mounting hardware in, and then finally off to a QC person.
I would be very surprised if someone ever gets a holster that their pistol doesn't fit in.
Speaking of molds! This was my favorite part of the tour. Row and rows and rows and rows of stacks of molds of pistols! While I was there I spied a mold for a S&W 4566. I see an order being placed shortly. In case you couldn't tell I was really impressed with the number of molds they have. They also do flashlights, multitools, and revolver speed loaders.
I seriously doubt that anyone in the industry has more molds than Blade-Tech does.
I asked why the Blade-Tech website did not list all the holster/pistol combinations that I know they have. For example, the traditional belt holster has a huge list of selectable pistols (like the 4566), but if you go to the Eclipse it is quite a bit shorter (no 4566).
Regarding this, there are a couple things to point out:
- There is a new website coming out and the current one is incomplete for all of the molds they have. If you call customer service they do have a full list. (They do have a toll free number too.)
- They haven't made molds for all of the holster combinations they could possibly make. In other words they probably have not made an Eclipse for a S&W 4566, although they can.
- They plan on offering the Eclipse for everything they have in the standard belt line. Unfortunately, they are not the same mold so they have make it.
- The Revolution holsters use completely different molds and they are VERY cost prohibitive. I wouldn't count on the list of supported pistols to expand greatly. They will probably only have/get molds for the most popular pistols (so, no 4566).
I asked about turn around time. They are currently at 5 weeks. This is in line with a lot of Kydex holster makers. They were actually embarassed - they had prided themselves that they until recently had a 1 -2 week turnaround previously. They are currently running 3 shifts a day including weekends to get caught up!
Now, order back logs might raise concern that QC could suffer, especially as employees work increased/more shifts. However, I was surprised and impressed that everyone there seemed to be happy--from customer service, to sales, to Kydex molder, fork lift driver, etc. Definitely a sign of a good company.
So--great products, superior variety of pistols molds, exemplary customer service and they have happy employees? Blade-Tech is definitely doing things right.
It is great that we generally wear more concealing clothes and can move away from a summer (small) gun to a bigger or fullsize, but I see but see little on how to carry when you have to actually spend time outside.
Traditional holster logic doesn't really work. OWB, IWB works fine for when you are just going out to your car or smoking in the parking lot, but it is not the same when you are out for hours (or longer).
You still have to access the pistol if you need it. Not so easy under your multiple layers of clothing and winter jacket. Yeah, I can conceal my 1006 or a fullsize 1911 under my winter coat, but can I get to it without unzipping 3 jackets or spend 5 minutes of fishing through clothing layers to get to it?
Here is what has and hasn't worked for me:
IWB - clearly inside the waist isn't really going to work very well.
OWB (outside belt holster) - this might work if you can put the pistol only under your winter coat. I have considered getting a "duty belt" or a Wilderness to supplement my regular belt. You could wear it over all of your layers.
It would be great if you had a patrol jacket, like 5.11's, where there are actually snaps for quick access to a sidearm. I don't own any of these...yet.
shoulder holster - actually resizing this to go over all of the layers of clothes and under your main coat works pretty good. You still have to unzip it for access it, but is fairly comfortable. You don't have to worry about printing since you already look like a marshmellow.
ankle holster - depends on the type of pants and weather. Trekking around outside (at least around here) even if there is no snow usually results in wet pants and wet backup pistol. Not so easy to access when dressed like the Micheli-man...
man bag - I will be darned but I have found that increasing the strap size of my Maxpedition to fit over everything including the winter coat works REALLY well. Still gives very quick access to the pistol and quick carry of other things like a flashlight (since it gets dark befor 5pm now).
jacket pockets - my ski jacket had pretty good front pockets that were perfect for a mini-Glock or J-frame. My current favorite jacket is a Columbia 3-in-1 that has cavernous zippered hand pockets. I suspect mini-Glocks will work and possibly bigger.
If you have any ideas, I have missed let me know. Keep in mind that for me it has to be concealed so drop or offset holsters won't work.
Man Bag II: What fits in a Maxpedition Versipack Fat Boy?
Written by reg mathuszSomebody asked what will fit in the Maxpedition Fat Boy. I always keep a Glock 23 in it, so I decided to retry to see what fits.
Glock 23? Yes, you don't even need the holster strap (I have a velcro strap that I use, not the official Maxpedition one).
S&W M&P fullsize? Yes
Colt 1911/Government? Yes, although I didn't think it did. I seem to remember the zipper catching on the hammer/beavertail. I wonder if when the bag was new it was stiffer and didn't work. One thing to note is that my Colt is series 80 style with a classic round ring hammer and stock (pre-duckbill) grip safety. Big grip safety tangs or fancy hammer? That may not work.
S&W 1006/4506? Nope.
S&W 1066/4566? Yes (5900's should fit too)
Sig P225? Yes
Sig P220? Yes, I thought not, but it seems to. Doesn't extract well with Hogue rubber panels (duh).
FN FNX? Nope, hammer catches zipper
Browning HiPower? Yes, suprisingly with ease
3" K/L frame? Yes
4" K/L? Nope, well, at least not with fullsize Hogues, or wood presentations
Smaller pistols will, of course, fit but you definitely will want the optional "holster" which is a velcro loop (or similiar) to angle the pistol so it can be withdrawn easily.
Hope that helps!
Galco leather belt vs Blade-Tech hybrid belt (gun belt as a dress belt?)
Written by reg mathuszYou have probably heard that a key component of carrying a pistol (at least on the hip or the waist band) depends on your belt.
I don't care if you buy the belt at Wal-Mart or Macys -- their belts stink. They are not thick enough or rigid enough to support any serious weight. Heck, I have even bought a couple belts, including a Bianchi "gun belt" that wasn't good enough.
Years I have sucked it up and bought Galco. In fact, my primary 1.5" leather belt is a Galco. It is over 10 years old! It cost, what I thought was a fortune at the time (I think it was $60) for a belt. It was worth every penny.
For dress belts I have used various department store 1.25" belts. Despite not carrying a pistol (ok, maybe a J-frame Airweight a couple of times) these belts never last. I ended up buying one or two a year from just daily wear.
I thought, although expensive I should get a good belt and not worry about for a long time and possibly be able to carry a pistol with it too.
I went and bought a black Galco. It was $80!
Ah, but it did not disappoint.
I wanted a brown one also, but was balking at spending another $80. I happened to be looking for a Blade-Tech holster locally when I found their line of hybrid belts. These are leather with a kydex insert/backing. Interesting--it was also about half the price. In brown. Sold!
Both belts make excellent dress belts. Well, for that they are certainly over-built. But, I do find myself now snapping on a multi-tool, cell phone, flashlight to it.
Carrying a pistol? Amazing. Both belts easily support a pistol! I have strapped fullsize 1911's and my big S&W's (1006) to it without a problem. The rigidity of a 1.5" is definitely missed though. I wouldn't want to carry the big items for an extendeed amount of time. However, I was pleasantly surprised that either belt comfortably carries a Glock 23 or a fullsize S&W M&P with ease. I wouldn't hesitate to carry either all day.
The differences between the two? (leather vs hybrid leather/kydex)?
Well, to be honest glancing it is hard to tell the difference. Both belts look like quality products. The Galco is finished on both sides including the threads, while the Blade-Tech is finished on one side-- The underside is a light tan.
Wearing the two does have a different feel. The Galco, being a traditional leather breaks in and stretches. The more you wear it the more it molds and fits to you. After you have it a while you can actual see it take shape. Commonly it will bend at the buckle notch you frequently use. One thing that is nice (about leather) is as you put more weight on it the belt will actually slightly give. Wearing heavy pistols like the 1006 is very comfortable. An alternative way to read into that is that the belt is very forgiving if you gain/lose a little weight. You can flucuate, say from summer to winter weight (lol) and still remain on the same belt notch.
The Blade-Tech hybrid is stiffer. It does not give. If it is tight it will always be tight. If you gain ....winter weight.... you are going to have to move to the next notch on the belt. This also comes into play with a heavier pistol. It doesn't give so it pulls the pistol in towards you, regardless of weight, or your body.
The advantage? Man, carrying the pistol is SNUG and in close--great for concealment! Disadvantage? Not necessarily the most comfy.
The end result? BOTH are great belts, and I wouldn't hesitate highly recommending either one!