BladeTech Revolution Holster for M&P Compact! Amazing customer service
Written by reg mathuszYou may have seen my post Caution: Do NOT use S&W M&P compact in a Blade-Tech Revolution (FS) holster.
In a nutshell I found that putting my M&P compact into the Revolution was not a good idea because magazine pops out (they actually only make it for the fullsize). The problem was, of course, only with the compact. Fullsize M&P in the Revolution was fine.
Blade-Tech saw my post and responded quickly that they would check it out, and send me a replacement that worked with both! I also asked that they cut the holster to the compact size. You will see pics why shortly.
When I told Blade-Tech that I could pick up the holster, since I was local, they invited me for a tour of their factory! OK, the holster thing first...
Click on the pic for fullsize.
Here is a close up of the holsters, I just thought it was interesting that my original had a S&W logo with little "Military Police" lettering while the new one has the opposite:
Holsters side by side to show difference in length (fullsize vs compact). Actually the new one is a little lower, the pic makes it look more dramatic than it is.
I think that little bit of material circled is the difference between the two. It was hard to get them both at the same angle to compare. Trust me there is a difference.
Top: Fullsize in the Revolution
Bottom: Compact in the new custom compact
If barrel length is important to you - this is how it should look
This is what the Compact pistol looks like in the Revolution holster which had the mag problem.
Here is what the fullsize looks like in the new compact holster. Looks worse in this pic than the next two.
From these next two pics you can see that it BARELY pokes out
Keep in mind my mag drop problem with the Revolution Holster was caused by using a pistol in their holster which it was not actually designed for (compact in a fullsize holster)! Blade-Tech provided a fix for my problem unsolicited and went above and beyond in customer service-- making me a new holster that worked with the fullsize AND compact and, at my request, even cut it for the shorter pistol for the compact pistol!
I really like the new holster. I hope they add it to the line up.
It's past midnight, my factory tour story will have to wait until tomorrow. But, I will leave you with this....I saw a mold for a S&W 4566 and Steyr pistols. In fact, I am pretty confident that no one has more molds of pistols than they do, and they are not all on their website yet.
People carry guns? Oh no! And In Woolrich? Fashion couture objections? & Maybe there IS a reason its concealed...and who is 'A'?
Written by reg mathuszHere is a recent article in the "NY Times": New Fashion Wrinkle: Stylishly Hiding the Gun
The article actually isn't bad. For folks that didn't know about the Woolrich Elite tactical line of clothes it was probably informative. They make a great line of clothes!
What I found alarming were the comments. Clearly folks do not realize that *49* States in the Union allow CCW. While some of the states are new and a great strides were made in the 90s and 2000s it is not exactly new. In fact, my home state has issued CCW licenses since the 70s.
One thing is clear -- the folks that came up with CONCEALED carry knew what they were doing. It is really out of sight out of mind! People are quite often not aware that their own state already has and has had CCW laws. I am amazed at how many people I run into in my own state that simply don't know.
A lot of the comments are clearly from folks who are untrained, unfamiliar, and quite frankly afraid of firearms.
Let's look at some of the statements. Well, worded less offensively anyway:
1. "If you carry a gun you are looking for trouble..."
I have legally carried a firearm for 20 years, pretty much every day. I have had zero incidents.
Some might ask 'Why bother carrying a gun?'
There have been a few times that I was glad that I had that I had a firearm. I would rather have it, than not need it.
2. "People who carry guns have an inferiority complex..." (usually referring to one's man-hood)
I think they are trying to say that people have firearms to make themselves feel more manly and potray themselves as "tough." A kind of peacocking, I guess. But it is concealed carry, right? So, you will never know when done correctly. Usually I think this is just said as an insult. That's fine, I don't really care. If that's the best argument (and type of argument) that they can come up with, well, good luck with their future.
Not everyone that owns a gun, sports car, 4x4, pickup, motorcycle, big tv, boat, big house, fancy computer, or drum kit, etc. has E.D.
Some times a cigar is just a cigar.
3. "People who carry guns are paranoid. I can't live like that -- fearing every shadow."
OK. So don't carry a firearm then. But, what's funny is when these folks object to others carrying firearms. Why is that? Read on...
4. "If you have a gun you are more likely to get angry and use it...It will
increase violence."
Hasn't happened yet, and besides -- look who's is being paranoid now? The assumption is that the licensed CCW holder can't control their temper. Why would you assume that? I think that a lot of these folks are projecting and it is probably a good thing that they don't carry a firearm.
If anything I find myself being much MORE conscious of actions/words to reduce the chance of being in an inflammatory situation.
That's right. You must steer clear of an altercation which could result in say a fist fight (and this is something I hear anti-gun people say: "what ever happened to just fist fighting?")
a person that is legally CCW'ing simply can NOT engage in that type of behavior or simply get 'into a fist fight.'
Think of the possible legal consequences of an armed person fighting with an unarmed person. I take this opportunity to recommend that every gun owner read "In the Gravest Extreme" by Massad Ayoob.
5. "People with guns didn't stop....(insert random violent act here)"
Neither did the police. And isn't one of the anti-gun arguments that since police carry firearms I don't need one?
6. "You are more likely to have your gun taken away..."
Some of these studies say that you more likely to have your gun taken away and used against you than if you don't have a gun.
Think about it ... if you don't own a gun you are pretty unlikely to have it taken away and used against you!
Training folks is the key. If you do ever encounter an adversary, hopefully that foe is less trained than you.
I wish people who oppose firearms would take the time to actually learn about them or try one out in a controlled setting.
It is not the law abiding citizen that should be feared. It is the criminal, and they don't bother to get a license or bother with a Woolrich shirt for concealment.
UPDATE: I just found these "reviews"/criticism by Googling the NYTimes article. I think that they objected most to the concept of gun owners trying to be "fashionable." Once again, its all about concealable-- If it wasn't for the NYT article they would still be clueless that the market even existed.
http://www.styleite.com/media/woolrich-gun-pants/#0
The features of the styleite.com page?
- Calvin Klein's Maybe Boyfriend Arrested For Cocaine Possession
- Gossip Girl Recap: It’s Not Who’s My Mom, It’s Who’s My Dad
- 6 Things To Expect During A Facial
- PHOTOS: Crystal Renn Is Back To Brunette For Vogue Mexico
And the fashionista.com featured article today?
- Awkward Poses, Visible Nips, Marabou Slippers and More Awesomeness From the 1979 Victoria’s Secret Catalogue
- Why Coco Rocha Is Pissed about Her Elle Brazil Cover
- and their "Top Story" (their own words): "Has Victoria Beckham Dropped the 'Posh' Act Once and For All?"
Sorry - those article titles crack me up! I am pretty sure that these folks and their readers are NOT Woolrich's target audience. It is interesting that the the NYT article did generate a response from them, including one that actually posted pics of the Woolrich Pants.
So, don't be looking for 'S' & 'B' to be wearing them (ha! not the ammo company). More likely to be something 'A' would wear. (Bonus points if you get both TV show references!)
Springfield 1911 updates: fix hammer drop, add ring hammer, sear, sear spring and fit new safety
Written by reg mathuszWell, it has been awhile since I posted 1911 hammer drop to half-cock (July 22, 2010!) Some projects just get pushed back. I have been messing with 10mm and 40s a lot more than 45ACPs lately, but I digress.
To recap my previous post...
The problem was that my 90s Edition Springfield 1911A1 (kind of in between the GI and the MilSpec before they offered either) had been converted with Ace Hindman's help to 45 Super and spent a number of years running Ace's "Tactical Loads" (185gr @ 1200-1400fps). Unfortunately, I suspect, that accelerated wear help bring about intermittent hammer drop. Meaning that the hammer falls from cock to half-cock. Not good.
Here is what it looked like (from the original post):
Examining it showed a little more wear on the hammer than I would like. I filed on it and was softer than I would have thought. In fact, I messed it up.
Oh well, I like ring hammers and might as well swap it out. Might as well do a few other things too since the parts more than likely would have to be fit. Here is what I ended up doing:
- STI Match Sear – these are HARD and are almost perfectly cut out of the bag
- EMC Ring (commander) round hammer – I just like the look of these and they are bars tock for the purists.
The sear and hammer went together perfectly! - Colt 1991 Commander grip safety – because I don’t need/want a beavertail, I don’t want to notch the stock one for the ring hammer. This one dropped right in.
- Wolff Sear Spring - very mild arching
- Replace frame pins – they had become loose, falling out if you tilt the pistol
- Colt aluminum solid long trigger – I love this trigger in my Delta. No frills, no set screw to back out. People looked at me like I was crazy. I think that if I had gone with a normal lightweight trigger I would not have had to arc the new sear spring. It replaces a Pachmayr long trigger (its polymer!)
- STI extended safety (more on this below). I actually wanted a classic 1911 Army-style safety but couldn't find one. Oh well, single-sided safety it was.
So, I needed to fit the original stock safety to work with the new parts. So, I fit it (more like attempted). It actually came out decently and functional but it dropped down to the "fire" position a little too low and the detent stop was a little off. A safety is cheap and I am kind of picky. My local gun smith fit it and checked that everything else was ok.
Here is what it looks like (finally) completed:
There we go, only 2 short years later it is completed and a new life for a pistol that I originally bought in 1990. At least I got better at taking pictures.
I am excited about my 6920 and had the camera out today anyway. So, you get some pics :)
This is a follow up to: Just picked up my Colt LE6920 "M4" - details and a little talk about the feedback I have been getting
I know as a lot of people say..."Pics! Or it didn't happen!" So, without further delay a March manufactured Colt LE6920. Click on the pic if you want to see the full size:
Colt Defense roll mark
New "M4 Carbine" roll mark
Other side
MPI stamped bolt
Bottom of carrier
Key staking
H buffer and you can see the fit and finish of the lower
Upper T Marks and also fit and finish
Castle nut staking
Roger's Super Stock, note the Colt Defense Logo
Removable buttpad with Colt logo
Bottom (mag well)
Barrel stamping
F marked front site, also note the included and installed side sling swivel. A nice touch.
The accessory pack packing. I included it because I thought it something you don't see every day. Note the label which says "Suswuehanna Association for the blind." It was included inside sling's bag
The included Colt accessory pack: sling, 2 20rd mags, manual, cleaning rod, 2 brushes and the rear sling swivel was a nice touch.
The blue label from the side of the box. I find it uninteresting but I notice that other people's threads have it, so I included it too. I think that not all of the older ones say "M4 Style Semi-Auto":
I am tired of reading about how Colt uses non-standard pins and you can't attach non-Colt uppers/lowers. This was true on my R6600 back in the 90s and maybe true of the "Target" sporter line but NOT on the 6920s.
Here is a Rock River Arms (RRA) upper with the Colt 6920 lower:
Here is the Rock River Arms (RRA) lower with the Colt 6920 upper:
There you go. One of the most regarded and argued about kings of the M4gery (civilian) world.
Steyr Fans! Cabelas will have Steyr M-A1 9mm pistols for $399!
Written by reg mathuszIn March I blogged that Steyr Arms USA had received a shipment of pistols (Steyr pistol fans - new shipment just in). At the time I checked with my LGS and they were priced pretty high. I don't recall exactly but I think it was in the $500 - $600 range.
Well, good news if you are looking. I just got a flyer from Cabelas that runs from April 26 - May 6.
In it is the Steyr M-A1 9mm pistol for $399!
Check out the specs here: Steyr M-A1 from SteyrArms.com. If you are a regular you probably know that I am big fan of the Steyr pistols. I have owned an S40 for quite a while. I got a good price on mine since it was during the GSI importation fiasco and Steyr's temporary withdrawl from import to the U.S. However, I paid more than that! And that was around 2002. Here are some pics of my S40: My S40
Anyway a great pistol at a great price!
Stock photo from Steyrarms.com (which the Cabela's ad appears to use also):
Just picked up my Colt LE6920 "M4" - details and a little talk about the feedback I have been getting
Written by reg mathuszFirst of all, I ordered it from my local LGS after having waited a few hours to go in from their call and missed their last batch (7). The price was $1029.99 + tax. That's $70 less than WalMart sells them for (note: none of my local Seattle/Tacoma area WalMarts sell guns that I know of). That is also significantly less than any of the online sources I could find.
Even an internet source at $995 (good luck finding one) + shipping + dealer fees + tax (yes, WA makes you pay sales tax for transfers) would have been more. My shop even apologized, apparently only a few months ago they were selling for $995+tax!
Wait time, however, was about 6 weeks. I don't know how many they got in, but they did have one up on the wall for sale.
OK, I didn't have time to snap pictures and it looks like everyone else's. This is what I got...
- Blue label box that says LE6920
- LE prefix SN
- Colt Defense rollmark
- M4 Carbine rollmark
- Roger's Super Stock
- The bag it came in says it was made in March
Fit and finish appear perfect. Definitely was test fired as their are brass marks on the deflector. Bolt closes perfectly when functioned slowly - something I haven noticed that other brands out of the box don't do. Other brands also have that "new bolt" smell when you cycle them. The rifle is also pretty well lubricated, something other brands don't always do. Staking (both) look great.
The stock is interesting. It feels nice. The cam lock seems a little flimsy, but then again it doesn't do much. I did notice that the fit on the extension tube is very tight. I couple of my old GI aluminum 30 rd mags were tight in the well. I will try them all out in a little while and see if it is just chance or consistent with a particular brand.
On to the questions/comments...
So, why didn't I get brand x?
Probably cost or availability. Colt's quality bang for buck at a little over $1000 is very good. They are simply a work-horse.
Yes there are better, but entry level LaRue or Noveske start at $1500. Enough of a difference for me to get the Colt and an EOTech or a lot of ammo/etc. Move up from entry level and you approach the cost of two 6920s!
One brand I wanted to handle was BCM. They just were not available to see or even buy!
LMT Defender was close. The standard version was noticeably more than the Colt and the SOPMOD brought it up even more. I wish they put their enhanced bolt in this rifle that would have made up a little more price difference. Also weird they don't use an H buffer.
Let's face it, Colt is also brand recognition. Not that I anticipate selling it, but if I had to, or wanted to upgrade to something else it shouldn't be too hard to sell the Colt. Especially since demand > supply
You are paying for the Colt pony and kool-aide
Well, this is true. But since the price is about $1000 it was in the sample ball park as other brands. Actually, well-priced considering that only a year or two ago they were going for $1200. Actually, if you can't find one locally and don't want to wait, I found more than a few vendors that were willing to sell you one today for $1200. Anyway, as the top instructors say: Colts consistently run (not that they don't ever put out a dud) and as mentioned before are always in demand.
A few folks recommended brands such as Rock River, Bushmaster, or to build my own
I currently own a RRA, a Bushmaster, an Oly and have a few that I put together myself. I like them all. I wanted something out of the box that was "done" with high quality parts and could be considered a "fighting carbine." I have hopes of taking some courses down the road. In fact, FAS (Firearms Academy of Seattle) is literally down the road (strangely, not in Seattle but Olympia area).
That stock sucks. It is not even going to be issued to troops. It is a Magpul CTR ripoff, the sling swivel attachment is too low and top attachment needs to be cut off!
It is designed and made by Bill Rogers so I am certain of its high quality and design. if you are unfamiliar please Google. Heard of Wilson Rogers products like the Wilson 47D magazine? Same person. Colt also claims that they modified it to make it more durable. Personally, I don't really see the revolutionary nature of the old stock and don't particularly care if it is issued or not--It either works or not.
A CTR ripoff? Well, they do kind of look similar. Functionally no though. The AR parts world is ripe with similar products. Ask Vltor -- they are/were suing Magpul over the ACS.
The sling swivel attachment is too low? Perhaps if you are comparing it to Magpul products. The SOPMOD and Vltors have it pretty much the same low position. Cut the top one off if you like, but it doesn't bother me.
And don't get me wrong, I am a BIG Magpul fan including the stocks. I just don't pooh a product because it isn't an "M." Again, it either works or doesn't.
Carbine length gas system destroys bolts and was designed for 14.5" barrels. Mid-length has less recoil and isn't as dirty. You should get a mid-length.
Actually, conceptually I like the mid-length better. However, Colt has been building 16"-ers for a long time and have it tuned to a science. As I recall Colt's first run was with 16" and adopted 14.5" later. I think it was in the "AR15 Sourcebook." Somebody is going to make me look it up, aren't they? :P
Regardless, Colt bolts are very high quality, the system works and works well. Maybe a MOE pistol grip for a spare bolt. I also have this crazy theory that it being slightly over gassed (vs mid-length) enhanced reliability, kind of like using a heavier recoil spring in a semi-auto pistol. Dirtier? Yes, I think so, but as for recoil I don't really notice the difference. Now a 6.8SPC yes! I wouldn't build it on a CAR length.
What's weird is that there are a lot of people endorsing piston rifles with CAR gas systems. These, to me, seem like the slam the bolt a lot harder and have more recoil. Maybe that is why Ruger went with a mid-length (equivalent) piston. Anyway, mid-length = nice, but not a necessity to me.
If Colt built a mid-length people would be crying out that it isn't "mil-spec" any more. Kind of like they are with the 6940.
You need to have a monolithic rail and free float barrel
No, I really don't. I have both and yes there is a difference but not much. Especially not for the cost of a lot of systems. This is a "duty" rifle, it will see 100yds distance average-- 200 yds max. For a rail, I will buy one of those little 2" strips that attach into the stock hand guard holes to attach a SureFire flashlight.
Hmm...I do need somewhere to put batteries. Maybe I will replace the stock afterall. :)
You need to replace the sling
The sling is very.....basic. I swear by Boonie Packer quick adjust cinchable 2point slings. They are tough, inexpensive ($25 shipped), and local.
AKs are better, especially now that you can add 12' of rail. Besides 30caliber cartridges are better.
I don't do Warsaw Pact rounds. Seriously. The most exotic (non-U.S.) round I own is a 303 Brit. As mentioned above I don't do rail. I wouldn't mind a quality AK like a Hungary or CZ, but they are not cheap any more. If you are going 'bigger is better' and there is certainly validity to that, in a non-AR platform (I am a big 6.8 fan) then I think I would just step up to a DSArms FAL or pony up the cash for a Springfield M1A. I am pretty heavily invested in the AR platform though, to make any type of switch.
I do believe in the mystique of the big '.30' rounds. In fact, I own a Marlin 3030 lever, an Inland M1Carbine, Enfield in 303 Brit, a 6.8 AR (.277 is close to .30) and the king -- a Springfield M1 Garand to meet the 30caliber criteria. :) Each round/platform meets a specific need. However, 5.56 will do fine against zombies.
Wholesale Sports/Sportsmans Warehouse has Magpul 30 rd PMAGS (non-window) on sale for $10!
That is a good price! I tried the ones I have and they fit perfectly.
My wife wants to know why for $1000 you only get a cardboard box instead of case
I don't know, but if it keeps the price down I am ok with it. Hazard4 is coming out with a sling bag that will hold an AR. Eberlestock also makes some nice backpacks with AR attachments. One of those will do the ticket. I do have cordura soft and hard rifle cases. But that's no fun.
But, $1100 (after tax) is still a chunk of change though (more than the replacement dryer I just had to buy) so I probably won't be buying anything too exciting for a bit. However, 223 ammo I have :)
Thanks for reading and all of the comments/suggestions/questions!
More...
Caution: *updated* Using S&W M&P compact in Blade-Tech Revolution holster!
Written by reg mathuszDo NOT use S&W M&P compact in Blade-Tech Revolution holster! -- Seriously, the mag falls out in the holster if it is tapped on the side!!
Yes, I know it is for the fullsize, but putting a compact in a fullsize holster is not really that outrageous or even illegal. The holster is still an amazing value!
More below...
Most of the time I like having a full size and compact of the same pistol because I can interchange magazines and holsters.
This is not the case with the Blade-Tech Revolution which is for a full size (they do not make a Rev for compacts): http://www.blade-tech.com/Smith-Wesson-Holsters-for-M-P-Series-Pistol-Revolution-Series-Holster-pr-1034.html#product_images
I picked up one of these locally very inexpensively ($30 I think) because I needed a holster to go the range that day. Having both a paddle and belt attachment they are a bargain and pretty comfortable. However, for OWB concealment there are holsters which hold the pistol closer to your body. For CCW I use an IWB.
I decided that I wanted to run to the grocery store and switched out the fullsize for the compact. To my surprise the mag wasn't seated! Hmm...I locked it back in and put on my jacked and must have slapped the side because I heard the mag click out again!
After experimenting briefly it became very obvious that any type of push to the side or handle of my 9c caused the mag release to engage in the holster!
Put the FS back in and no problem. The FS stayed in the holster.
Below are the stock photos from the Blade-Tech website. These prominently display the "M&P" logo, while mine has a big "S&W" instead. Maybe this has been fixed in later versions, but I would try it first. I would still buy another one again.
Gear Scout's post: Breaking- US Army places order for 24,000 M4 Carbines with Remington
Seems that about Remington is getting ready to make U.S. Army M4s in their Ilion, NY facility. So, now they will be "milspec" and gain access to the infamous and much coveted Colt TDP.
Interesting!
S&W (registrered trademark) M&P (registered trademark) Shield (registered trademark) - small, thin and inexpensive
Written by reg mathuszI don't have a lot of details on the newly introduced S&W M&P Shield (registered trademarks). But since people asked and since S&W just emailed this out... here is the promo flyer:
[removed due to request from S&W LEGAL]
I just got in a couple of cases (10 boxes x 20 rds each) of Hornady 5.56 TAP with the 75gr T2 bullet. Yep, its 5.56 TAP and not the 223 version.
The 5.56 is a little hotter and uses the T2 bullet with cannelure. It also comes in normal brass (not black). Traditionally, the 5.56 variation has been very hard to get. Additionally, it is designed to work in 1:9 and 1:7 twists.
Browsing some internet forums reveals that the law enforcement that use it, like it. Ballistics-wise it gets very good results and reviews. Here is Hornady's writeup from their law enforcement page: http://hornadyle.com/_img/hornady_tap_report.pdf
I was a little surprised to see that it is loaded with LC (Lake City) brass but Hornady has said that it uses other people's components in addition to their own (specifically TAP). There must have been (or is) a huge demand for them to not use (or have) their own brass. Mine is head-stamped LC08 and LC09.
Anyway, there is a lot of material written on this round including comparisons of the 223 and 5.56 variant. I am happy that it is available, at least for the time being. I like the concept of their SuperPerformance 5.56, but this can be found for significantly less and has been known to down fairly large game.
Anyway, some pics (click pic for closeup):
